How this learning target compares
REAL leads with practised disposition. Three comparable frameworks lead with different things. For this learning target, here is how each one approaches the same ground — and where the divergences are.
Pupils studying secondary RSHE learn to talk about emotions accurately, recognise that worrying and feeling down are normal, and understand common types of mental ill health. [rshe-pilot-extracts §11, §12, §13] REAL covers adjacent territory but adds the science: students at Bands D and above learn dual-process accounts of emotion, the stress-response window, habit formation, and the neurobiology of attraction, rejection and loss, and use those frameworks to analyse patterns in described relationships. [real-framework-overview §14, §15] RSHE doesn't reach that explanatory framing.
Welsh CfW
leads with understandingAt Progression Step 5, CfW asks learners to "show an understanding of the complex nature of relationships in a range of contexts", [cfw-pilot-extracts §16] and at earlier steps to develop empathy and regulate emotions. [cfw-what-matters §8] What CfW does not include is the biological and psychological material REAL builds in at Bands D–F: dual-process accounts of emotion, attachment theory, the neuroscience of attraction and loss. [real-framework-overview §14, §15, §16] CfW treats relationships as something to learn through; REAL also treats them as something to study.
CASEL's five competencies cover the practice of relationships, self-management of emotions, and decision-making. [casel-framework-definition §1, §3] The biology and psychology of emotional development sit outside the framework — CASEL doesn't specify mechanism-level content. REAL's LT 4.4 adds that explanatory layer at Bands D–F: dual-process accounts of emotion, attachment theory, and the neuroscience of attraction, rejection and loss, applied to real or described relationships. [real-framework-overview §14, §15, §16] A CASEL-based programme covers the relational practice but not the underlying science.
This per-LT view is one of three lenses. The whole-framework essay sets each framework's centre of gravity; the by-theme view shows where overlaps and gaps cut across LTs.
See the broader comparison →