How this learning target compares
REAL leads with practised disposition. Three comparable frameworks lead with different things. For this learning target, here is how each one approaches the same ground — and where the divergences are.
RSHE's secondary respectful-relationships content addresses bullying and stereotyping directly: types of bullying including online, the impact, and "the responsibilities of bystanders to report bullying", [rshe-pilot-extracts §33] plus stereotypes based on sex, race, religion, sexual orientation or disability. [rshe-pilot-extracts §35] REAL's LT 4.3 spans parallel ground at Bands B–E and adds a Band F move RSHE doesn't reach: students analyse a real bystander success or failure and propose conditions that would change the next outcome. [real-framework-overview §47]
Welsh CfW
leads with understandingWM4 in CfW asks how social influences shape identity — at PS3 learners recognise that "rules, norms and behaviours… have an influence on me", [cfw-pilot-extracts §22] at PS5 "promote positive attitudes and values, and…challenge harmful ones". [cfw-pilot-extracts §24] Bullying isn't named within Health and Well-being; it appears in the separate RSE Code as one of the harms RSE can help reduce. [cfw-rse-statutory-principles §4] REAL's LT 4.3 focuses on individual recognition and bystander response; [real-framework-overview §45, §46] CfW's WM4 angle is sociological.
CASEL's Social Awareness at G6–8 names "stereotyping, discrimination, and prejudice and understand how they can be harmful"; [casel-pilot-extracts §19] at G9–10 students "recognise and describe unfairness and injustice in many forms including attitudes, speech, behaviors, policies, practices, and laws". [casel-pilot-extracts §26] REAL's LT 4.3 shares the recognition content but adds the bystander-response move as a systematic skill: at Band D, justifying a proposed response based on safety, proportionality, and what the targeted person is likely to need. [real-framework-overview §46]
This per-LT view is one of three lenses. The whole-framework essay sets each framework's centre of gravity; the by-theme view shows where overlaps and gaps cut across LTs.
See the broader comparison →